Stunts Forum

ZakStunts - the Competition => The Graveyard => Track Design Contest 2002 => Topic started by: zaqrack on October 25, 2002, 04:30:13 PM

Title: Dumb
Post by: zaqrack on October 25, 2002, 04:30:13 PM
Awaiting your comments on Dumb...
Title: Dumb
Post by: al il professore on October 25, 2002, 04:55:04 PM
driving this one kicks ass! too long for other car than indy. Not well scenerized. Landscape is awful. But its four, as driving counts better to me. I like it because its jumpy.
Title: Dumb for dumbers?
Post by: Mingva on October 25, 2002, 05:46:31 PM
I raced with Jaguar, Indy and Audi on it. Haven't fun to race with slow car. Only 6th gear gave some fun.

Advantages: challene?;
Disadvantages: lack of scenery, some corners, a little long and boring.

There's my vote:
Fun and Interest - 1.5 from 3
Length and Layout - 2.5 from 3
Terrain and Scenery - 1.5 from 3

So, my overal vote for Dumb is 3
Title: Dumb
Post by: Krys TOFF on October 26, 2002, 02:01:38 AM
Well, this track has been designed for 6th gear.
And i like 6th gear :D
But there's a lack of scenery. Not the most important for me, but it makes 4 instead of 5.
4, that's my vote.
Title: Dumb
Post by: zaqrack on October 26, 2002, 12:11:30 PM
Indy score: 3 too 6th geary for a comp. track, but nice for live event
Lambo score: 2. It's boring, because it's too 6th geary. :)
Scenery: 1. template terrain, no nice things :(
Comp: length 5, ideal, shortcuts: 3, looks ok, but no protection. -->4
15/6---> 2.5 --> only a 2 at me. :(

Zak
Title: Bonzai Joe
Post by: BonzaiJoe on October 26, 2002, 04:56:49 PM
Good track
Awful terrain
Mediocre competition compatibility
Good length
Gets a 3 here. Too much power gear driving on the grass and too little scenery.
Title: Dumb
Post by: CTG on October 27, 2002, 05:34:16 PM
Horrible design...  :evil: But it's very fast, so the track is one of my favorites (not for COMPETITION, something like Skids...) Mark: strong 3
Title: Dumb
Post by: CTG on October 28, 2002, 05:30:28 PM
I think this track is not enough to take part in this competition. It's only two points...  :?
Title: Dumb
Post by: CTG on October 28, 2002, 11:21:57 PM
Quote from: "CTG"I think this track is not enough to take part in this competition. It's only two points...  :?
And can you explain me why do you say that?  :twisted:
Title: Dumb
Post by: CTG on October 30, 2002, 06:46:54 PM
Hey CTG! Perharps its really awful! I think I can't give better then 2 points.
Title: Dumb
Post by: Akoss Poo a.k.a. Zorromeister on November 09, 2002, 03:35:22 PM
Somehow I liked this track, although it's not a very special one. Let's give a 4.
Title: vote
Post by: Argammon on November 15, 2002, 11:07:04 PM
-no terrain objects at all
-to many straight passages
-not enoug stunts
-to easy

sorry rating: another 2
Title: Dumb
Post by: alanrotoi on November 16, 2002, 09:05:57 PM
It's a common track, I like it. The difficulty is medium, the fun is medium. But I don't like the last 20 seconds, I don't know why but I really hate it. Somebody could explain it? I can't race that part, I mean don't want to race.... so strange

Calificaci?n: 3.
Title: Dumb
Post by: CTG on November 22, 2002, 01:59:22 AM
Another good one, with average scenery/ not so interesting- 3 points
Title: Dumb and dumber
Post by: Krys TOFF on November 23, 2002, 04:46:37 PM
This track is one of the 1st sent. And, i voted 4 on it.

But the more i see new tracks, the more i think my vote was too high.

I mean, the scenery is inexistant and it's too easy to reach 6th gear.

Not that i don't like 6th gear of course :wink: , but this track deserves nothing but a 3 maximum, not the 4 i gave it.

Please change my vote on the "voteboard" Zak.
Title: Dumb
Post by: Usrin on November 24, 2002, 02:36:44 PM
It doesn't look bad, but it would be much interesting with more stunts.

My vote: 3.