Author Topic: How serious are the records?  (Read 6959 times)

BonzaiJoe

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5081
    • View Profile
    • Purple
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2009, 02:30:54 PM »
And how low can we go? Below 9 minutes?

It could also be interesting to see a YouTube video of the record laps in continuation, but of course that's impossible (although at this point I think it might even be a good idea to make all Permanent Competition replays public). It would mean the ultra-RHers would take every record, but does that matter at this stage?

Still I guess there would be a problem with Renato's Cherry replay, which probably won't play correctly.
But we can't be quite sure.


Duplode

  • Considering trying out spam
  • *******
  • Posts: 3426
  • Through the astral door - to soar
    • View Profile
    • The Southern Cross Stunts Trophy
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2009, 01:09:58 AM »
And how low can we go? Below 9 minutes?

I really don't know - up to now I couldn't bring myself to drive further than halfway on the longer tracks, so I can't assess the potential  :)

It could also be interesting to see a YouTube video of the record laps in continuation, but of course that's impossible

Impossible due to technical reasons or due to lack of agreement among record holders? For the first issue, a continuous video might skip the long tracks and the closed versions - and then the only involved parties (discounting the already public Default/Z79 lap) are me and you...

It would mean the ultra-RHers would take every record, but does that matter at this stage?

Now that you asked, I must admit the answer is no  :) A YouTube video would still be better than making the replays available, though.

Still I guess there would be a problem with Renato's Cherry replay, which probably won't play correctly.

With a video, that wouldn't be a problem...

BonzaiJoe

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5081
    • View Profile
    • Purple
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2009, 08:26:30 AM »
1: There's only one way to find out! But I can tell you they are quite serious records. Especially Cherries is insane.

2: I'm suggesting a 9:15 video of all the tracks, with a caption at the bottom going something like "Default: AYRTON  0.31.25" (I forgot about closed tracks, don't really care about those because of the strange half-rules)

3: That may be right

4: I guess if someone sat down and edited, it wouldn't be a big problem.
But we can't be quite sure.


Mark L. Rivers

  • Straight Specialist
  • ***
  • Posts: 1179
    • View Profile
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #18 on: March 24, 2009, 11:15:12 PM »
And how low can we go? Below 9 minutes?


I've just given my little contribute (0,20 seconds), just a fillip to start... :)
Of course, you'll see a scoreboard modified in its first line when Zak will update the permanent tracks' page... ;)
Btw, bye all! :)


Chulk

  • Trying out spam for the first time
  • ********
  • Posts: 3621
  • "Do, or do not. There is no try."
    • View Profile
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #19 on: March 24, 2009, 11:31:49 PM »
Weehh! Mark is here! How about telling us what the "L" means...
There's a General Custer for every urban tribe

Mark L. Rivers

  • Straight Specialist
  • ***
  • Posts: 1179
    • View Profile
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #20 on: March 25, 2009, 09:11:43 AM »
And how low can we go? Below 9 minutes?


I've just given my little contribute (0,20 seconds), just a fillip to start... :)
Of course, you'll see a scoreboard modified in its first line when Zak will update the permanent tracks' page... ;)
Btw, bye all! :)



Ooops, sorry... my new absolute record is on a "closed" track, so...  ::)   no contribute from me in the "9 minutes cause"... at least, at this moment... ;)


CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #21 on: March 25, 2009, 11:47:30 AM »
I can't remember the last time touching permanent tracks. Maybe I should kick ass on the closed versions... ;)

zaqrack

  • Administrator
  • Addicted to spam
  • *****
  • Posts: 4526
    • View Profile
    • ZakStunts
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2009, 11:58:08 AM »
I suggest you should wait a bit, I intend to transform them to owoot rules...

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #23 on: March 25, 2009, 12:10:23 PM »
I intend to transform them to owoot rules...

You shouldn't... Bernie's Closed is a legend, I used the way switching even 7 years ago.

Krys TOFF

  • Addicted to spam
  • *********
  • Posts: 4713
  • Stunts Career project manager
    • View Profile
Re: How serious are the records?
« Reply #24 on: April 14, 2009, 10:29:33 PM »
I suggest you should wait a bit, I intend to transform them to owoot rules...
Mmmm, why not keeping both : strict owoott and current... let's say... "free" closed rules. ;)