Kalpen: two months long BB 1.0 races.
What is the problem ? 2 months long tracks or 1.0 version ? Or maybe you don't want to see Mark, Zak or Mislav too highly classified in your WRL...
WSC: still not the level I exclude.
OK then, go win a track at WSC and we'll see.
Who were WSC winners ? Ayrton (17 victories), Gutix (4 victories), me (2 victories) then Mark L. Rivers and Dark Chaser with both 1 victory.
Do I need to remind you the talent of Ayrton, Gutix, DC and Mark with the indy ? Sorry, but I disaggree with the "low level" excuse.
weight of USC is 80%, SDR 60% compared to ZSC. I think it's fair enough.
Oh, ZS is above everything and USC is higher level than SDR ? Really ? Why ?
Because Ayrton or Renato Biker are not racing SDR and USC so their level are lower ? Then WSC is higher level than USC and SDR with this opinion.
Because of the number of pipsqueaks ? Then no competition will ever catch the level of Alan Rotoi's 4DSL or Kalpen 2000-2001.
And why ZS remains as the "top level" competition as it's quite biaised by the special rules of each tracks ?
No, no, no, no. I will never aggree that one competition is supposed to be ranked better than any other.
Look at Olympic games : one gold medal is one gold medal, whatever the sport.
The only thing I will aggree not to mix is RH with noRH. They both deserve their own ranking.