Author Topic: Valdivia (USC 92)  (Read 3113 times)

Akoss Poo

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5721
  • BÖFF!!!
    • View Profile
Valdivia (USC 92)
« on: October 06, 2014, 09:12:30 AM »
This time we will go to South America, namely to Chile, and drive the Lamborghini LM 002 there. After the tricky Utrecht and the difficult and powergear driven ZCT159, our fingers can have a rest with this slow and good-handling car. The track difficulty is 3/5, though I think it is hard to build a really difficult track for this car. The estimated winning time is 1:40, though I haven't given a real try to the Valdivia track yet.

Again, I must say: fasten your seatbelt!
« Last Edit: October 20, 2014, 10:00:51 AM by CTG »
A jó nök is büdöset szarnak!

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2014, 09:22:28 AM »
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! ^_^

Site updates will remain my task, so I'll do it in the evening.

Akoss Poo

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5721
  • BÖFF!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2014, 10:36:15 AM »
Just to help the PTB clock start early.
A jó nök is büdöset szarnak!

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2014, 10:49:23 AM »
Just to help the PTB clock start early.

I'll send a listfiller in the evening.

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2014, 08:47:21 PM »
Here it is.

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2014, 06:49:25 PM »
Slightly better.

Akoss Poo

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5721
  • BÖFF!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2014, 06:58:08 PM »
Blötty.
A jó nök is büdöset szarnak!

Duplode

  • Moderator
  • Considering trying out spam
  • *****
  • Posts: 3428
  • Through the astral door - to soar
    • View Profile
    • The Southern Cross Stunts Trophy
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2014, 01:01:50 AM »

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2014, 08:08:35 AM »

Akoss Poo

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5721
  • BÖFF!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2014, 08:18:48 AM »
But this is not the association game, hey, go to the relevant topic!
A jó nök is büdöset szarnak!

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2014, 08:19:53 AM »
But this is not the association game, hey, go to the relevant topic!

Check the replay under the picture. It's worth to see.

Akoss Poo

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5721
  • BÖFF!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2014, 12:35:08 PM »
bÖFF!
A jó nök is büdöset szarnak!

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #12 on: October 08, 2014, 12:40:42 PM »
It seems I have to publish a 3.82 kB replay... ::)

Akoss Poo

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5721
  • BÖFF!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #13 on: October 08, 2014, 01:59:22 PM »
It seems I have to publish a 3.82 kB replay... ::)

Why?
A jó nök is büdöset szarnak!

CTG

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 20046
  • Psycho
    • View Profile
    • UnskilledStunts Championship
Re: Valdivia
« Reply #14 on: October 08, 2014, 03:06:43 PM »
It seems I have to publish a 3.82 kB replay... ::)

Why?

There's the point: it seems I have to publish a 3.81 kB replay... ::)