Author Topic: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic  (Read 895 times)

USC_closure

  • Guest
OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« on: April 20, 2015, 09:20:01 PM »
'cause ZacharyStunts shoutbox is not a proper place for that anymore.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2015, 09:23:12 PM by C T G »

Duplode

  • Moderator
  • Considering trying out spam
  • *****
  • Posts: 3406
  • Through the astral door - to soar
    • View Profile
    • The Southern Cross Stunts Trophy
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2015, 01:09:32 AM »
Is this thread really necessary?
« Last Edit: April 21, 2015, 01:12:29 AM by Duplode »

zaqrack

  • Administrator
  • Addicted to spam
  • *****
  • Posts: 4527
    • View Profile
    • ZakStunts
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2015, 09:38:19 AM »
I cannot help to think that he is pushing for the full ban.

USC_closure

  • Guest
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2015, 10:31:32 AM »
I cannot help to think that he is pushing for the full ban.

You make the decisions, but I guess I can have an opinion. When I see X and Y making questionable statements, I answer them.

USC_closure

  • Guest
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2015, 10:47:34 PM »
Okay, why not. However, it's a kind of strange decision.

- So, my original account is lost with all my personal messages during the last 3 years. Huge loss, I have to say.
 
- Access to Stunts related topics (car mods, questions, etc.): I guess nobody picked this option, not even the strict Rotoi, who asked to give access to civil topics instead of any Stunts topics. Yes, it's not a wishlist, but accessing LW subforum and my original account would be a lot more important.

- Limitations in USC subforums: starting topics would be necessary. Not a big deal anyway, as only 2-3 topics can be expected before the closure. But for the sake of completeness, I would like to create and handle USC topics as before (moderator level, as long as it's running). Since you can restore any subforums, you don't have to be afraid of kamikaze topic deletions. If I can choose, this one would be my primary request. If it's not an option, please give the moderator rights to Duplode, as he will handle the USC "heritage" (archives).

- UPDATE: NO ACCESS TO PERSONAL MESSAGES, EVEN WITH THIS ACCOUNT? WHY?
« Last Edit: April 22, 2015, 11:11:31 PM by C T G »

zaqrack

  • Administrator
  • Addicted to spam
  • *****
  • Posts: 4527
    • View Profile
    • ZakStunts
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2015, 10:42:59 AM »
Because you are banned from community life due to your past behaviour on the forum and shoutbox.
You can contribute to Stunts if you want to, but are generally excluded from community life. You did a lot of damage and you plan to do more. Nobody wants that.

Let me know what topics you want to create in the USC subforum and I will set them up. I cannot perform a partial database restoration and I do not trust you, so no moderator access.

Find another channel if you want to stay in touch with people from here with and perhaps think twice before you repeatedly start trolling again in such a small community.



USC_closure

  • Guest
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2015, 10:51:06 AM »
Let me know what topics you want to create in the USC subforum and I will set them up. I cannot perform a partial database restoration and I do not trust you, so no moderator access.

I would rather choose the above mentioned option: give moderator rights to Duplode. He's an active pipsqueak in USC.

USC_closure

  • Guest
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2015, 01:15:13 PM »
Btw do you remember this one?  Poo was banned for a while... :D

Akoss Poo

  • Spam, egg, spam, spam, bacon and spam
  • *
  • Posts: 5720
  • BÖFF!!!
    • View Profile
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2015, 02:21:24 PM »
Yes, I remember. It was a week long ban for hurting the admin, which was lenghtened by mistake (somehow I could not re-enter after the ban), which resulted in the appearance of Ezekiel Kemboi (the same mistake resulted in the appearance of Jacky-, though BJ wasn't banned of course).
A jó nök is büdöset szarnak!

USC_closure

  • Guest
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2015, 07:00:25 PM »

USC_closure

  • Guest
Re: OFF: Reflections on 'Banned users' topic
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2015, 05:23:14 PM »
for hurting the admin

The admin is hurted by a bike accident. I have 'déjà vu', it also happened in 2006.