I won't tell who was playing as it doesn't really matter.
The game was played with 5 minutes per player only and at the end the moves seem to be even crazier as both players ran out of time and only had 30 secs left for the last 10 moves or so.
It's not a high quality game but fun to watch anyways.Black shouldn't have lost IMO.
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 h6 4. c3 a6 5. d4 exd4 6. cxd4 d6 7. h3 Na5 8.
Bd3 g6 9. Bd2 c6 10. Qa4 b6 11. Bxa5 bxa5 12. Nc3 Bd7 13. Qc2 Bg7 14. O-O
Nf6 15. e5 dxe5 16. dxe5 Nh7 17. Bxg6 fxg6 18. Qxg6+ Kf8 19. Rad1 Qe8 20.
Qe4 Rd8 21. Nd4 Kg8 22. e6 Nf6 23. Qe2 Bc8 24. Nxc6 Rxd1 25. Rxd1 Qxc6 26.
Rd8+ Ne8 27. e7 Bf6 28. Nd5 Bg5 29. Nc7 Qxc7 30. Rxe8+ Kf7 31. Rxh8 Qc1+ 32.
Kh2 Bf4+ 33. g3 Bg5 34. e8=Q+ Kf6 35. Q2e6+ Kg7 36. Q6f7# {Black checkmated}
1-0
Well, white played really well (except Q2e6, but that's too late to matter anyway) and black didn't play so well. I don't see where black could have avoided losing, except of course in the opening :-)
In the middle game the chass computer ranks whites chances to win around -2 to -3 meaning black is the favourite.
Of course this is theory.
First of all it need black defenind really well and a small mistake can easily make him lose and secondly it was only a "blitz" game in which agressive play like white used often results in winning as the opponent does not have the time to think of a good defense...
That's really interesting. It means there must have been a flaw in white's attack, but it would have taken a really strong player to see it, and except from that flaw, the attack was brilliant. Interesting...