Text only | Text with Images

Stunts Forum

Abandoned Competitions => Indy Racing Cup => ISA-IRC: General Chat => Topic started by: juank 23 on May 23, 2002, 03:00:00 PM

Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: juank 23 on May 23, 2002, 03:00:00 PM
hi ben how are you, i have this little question for you, its because im running without replay handling and i want to know how i am between the ones who use it and the ones doesnt use it, thanks bye
Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: ben snel on May 23, 2002, 03:00:00 PM
if you did that REALLY without replay handling, you're the best driver of us all.

BY FAR

I'm so sorry that I only don't believe this...  
Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: Anonymous on May 23, 2002, 09:00:00 PM
As I see it, it's possible to drive a time without replay handling between 1:25 and 1:26. The track doesn't have parts where you have to use RH one million times until you can do a special trick. There are no long 6thGear-parts. (I haven't managed it yet to get into the 6thGear before the long straight paved road.) So I personally think that the gap between the RH-users and those who use it won't be more than 8-10 sec. So, in my opinion the winner-time will be around 1:16-1:18. I will drive without RH for the next days, but I will also work on a RH-time if it's necessary to get into the points.
Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: juank 23 on May 24, 2002, 12:00:00 PM
ben, i just have to say that i really love this game and i really enjoy running it without replay handling, its important for the championship to get points but i really hate replay handling, i dont remember in wich track i try it, i spend 1 minute and i get borried, so believe me i NEVER USED REPLAY HANDLING and a little funny thing is that you say that you dont believe this time is real, welll i am sending in this moment a 1:25:10 WITHOUT replay handling and belive it or not i am really a good driver, try it without rh and you will see its real dirving fun
Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: ben snel on May 24, 2002, 06:00:00 PM
i decided i believe you, after trying a couple of times myself. my third try was very ok, 1:27,something

sorry, and thanks: now I realise that my 1:23 is really shitty!  
Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: juank 23 on May 25, 2002, 12:00:00 PM
ben if theres no problem, when you make the amalgamated fastest time of this track can you tell me how i am between the best time is to know in which part i have to work hard, i mean faster parts or slower, thank you and good luck...  
Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: Bonzai Joe on May 25, 2002, 01:00:00 AM
You can get about 1.23 wiithout replay handling. Of course theoretically you could drive a perfect round without replay handling, but you're not likely to....
Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: juank 23 on May 27, 2002, 03:00:00 PM
what do you mean by saying that, are you trying to tell me that i am not able to do it by my capacities?????
Title: ben , that time was with or without reply handling??
Post by: Bonzai Joe on May 27, 2002, 06:00:00 PM
The english use the phrase "you" as another way of saying "anyone". So when I say, "you're not likely to" it doesn't mean that you - Juank23 - is not likely to, it means that no one is, since it is obviously impossible.
Text only | Text with Images