it`s too short I think.
I had an 1:34.xx for Bogota, but forget to send it, and had only twice time to drive the track in 2 weeks.
Zak
Yeah, I know that it is very short, but I also think that 1 month is too long. 3 weeks would be perfect.
12XU
then why don`t you have 3week long priods?
I`ll stuck to 1/month, because there are only 11 cars in stunts.
Zak
When we planned our competition, we thought that it is possible to drive a track within 2 weeks, and sure, it is.
But now, we know that many drivers are racing in two or even more competitions.
That means that they have to drive up to 5 tracks a month.
That's the time problem.
I haven't talked to Pershing and Agent Orange yet.
We will discuss the problem.
12XU
Ok, let?s decide it in a democratic way.
How much time do you want to have for our tracks?
Possible solutions:
1. We don?t change the "2 Races per month" system.
2. We make one race in 3 weeks system:
Schedule: Toronto: Monday 1. April - Sunday 21. April
Race 4: Mo 22. April - Su 12. May
Race 5: Mo 13. May - Mo 2.June
.
.
and so on
3. We make one race per month.
Personally I vote for the 2 races per month system.
My Utopia: I would prefer the 3 weeks system if all competitions had it and if we don?t start the races at the same time. Then the drivers will have the chance to concentrate on one (or once on 2) competition(s) every week. It would mean less stress for the competitiors and no competition between the competitions.
Schedule (example):Charles: Mo 1.April ? Su 21.April
ISA: Mo 1.April ? Su 21.April
Roy: Mo 8.April ? Su 28.April
Zak: Mo 15. April ? Su 5.May
We would also have a new ISA-Worldranklist every week and not just twice a month.