this was topic for many occasions on the chatroom.
I've finally found a correct IQ test on the web.
http://www.iqtest.dk
sit down, relax and solve it if you want.
Mine is 133 on this scale, just measured. It's almost the same result like I did on the test IRL last year. That was a different scale, but I had the same result in percentage.
its made to evaluate the danish brains... they have slower ones, due to polluted fish eating overdose :)
i will give a try to this test and inform you about my IQ in an english test :)
I would especially want to see the results of:
Mingva
Krys Toff
CTG
I will take this test tomorrow when I feel less tired and hung over. It's danish, but I haven't seen it or heard of it before.
`
Piss of, guest :P Better tell your IQ first :twisted:
`
Anyway, I cann't open that site :?
I would figure that test is rather one dimensional.
A real IQ test (for example the one's you can do at a psychologist) (hope that's the right name))
is about more than only to fill the missing piece in one of 9 squares.
Actually that's the most boring test I have seen.
the MENSA had the same entry test, so probabyl its a good one, even if its boring :)
anyway you can switch language to english :)
Do you blindly believe in the Mensa?
And even Mensa is not Mensa.
In germany the Mensa test is about 4 different 'areas' of intelligence while that test really seems to be one dimensional.
Actually if you would do some research about that matter you would realize that that type does only reveal a kinda small percentage of a human's intelligence as it is -again- one dimensional.
I have no doubt there was that kind of test in hungary,but even in mensa meetings a lot of members don't hold that type of test in good regards.
The best,but unfortunatly most expensive test would really to go to a psychologist with a diploma at which you can usually get a far diverse and test thus results.
But that is really beside the point, as it is IQ levels we are discussing, and it's an approved IQ test, boring or not. If you want to prove that you rule in the IQ-area, rule in the IQ tests. If you want to prove that you rule at other forms of intelligence, be my guest, just don't blame an IQ test for only measuring people's boring, cold, one-dimensial IQ-level.
You completly got it from BJ.
First of all I don't know if that test is certified while I think zaq's was.
And more important those other types of tests I was talking about are certified IQ tests as well.
So we only got 2 conclusions:
1)Different types of tests with different results. -should not happen
2)Different types of tests with prox same results -should happen
As I said both tests want to measure the IQ,and I still think the other test is better at doing so.
Re reading your post makes it even make less sense!
'But that is really beside the point, as it is IQ levels we are discussing, and it's an approved IQ test, boring or not.'
The other type of test is certified also.And noone eats wisdom with spoons.Maybe we are allowed to critizise one type of tests if we don't think it's to usefull?And yes,IMO it is one dimensional!
'If you want to prove that you rule in the IQ-area, rule in the IQ tests'
As if they would all be like the same?I don't like your unfriendly 'undertone' btw.
'just don't blame an IQ test for only measuring people's boring, cold, one-dimensial IQ-level.'
The IQ level is not one dimensional but that test is.And for you,I will repeat myself: a lot of certified test's are not like that.Actually that kind of test is usually being used as a culture free replacement test!
Sorry you got no point here. *g*
in real life i just categorize the people that speak about their intelligence, the low value of IQ tests and the size of their dick (yes its the same problem in fact) in the "less valuable persons"
I can be a good friend with other persons (5%) who with i speak long time about some deeper subjects.
In the beginning it was a funny game, nothing more. if you felt hurt by any of the post on this thread, ask apologizes to the "guest"
What I was trying to say was that IQ is defined by the tests, and that you can't really expect an IQ test to be entertaining. Sorry about the alleged unfriendly undertone.
Quote from: "Anonymous"I would especially want to see the results of:
Mingva
Krys Toff
CTG
Whoever you were (argammon maybe ?), I did 124. CTG and Mingva, it's your turn to make this test :arrow:
oui le guest ?tait une personne imbue d'elle m?me. il n'y en a pas beaucoup dans la communaut?. quoique... :)
As far as I remember, my result was 133 few years ago (or 131, I'll look for the result somewhere in my archives). I don't believe in this kind of test anyway - sense to 2D geometry can't be coupled with real skills, knowledge or logical thinking on more realistic fields. Even with this score, I'm too retarded for chess or any table games, while some people with ~90-100 are really talented in them.
A better question is: taking account of your mental skills, what are your main strengths and weaknesses?
135, picture attached.
Quote from: CTG on March 12, 2013, 04:45:20 PM
As far as I remember, my result was 133 few years ago (or 131, I'll look for the result somewhere in my archives). I don't believe in this kind of test anyway - sense to 2D geometry can't be coupled with real skills, knowledge or logical thinking on more realistic fields. Even with this score, I'm too retarded for chess or any table games, while some people with ~90-100 are really talented in them.
A better question is: taking account of your mental skills, what are your main strengths and weaknesses?
126, i remember taking another one a while back where i got 133 or 135 but i never took it seriously, it seems most of these test are based on figuring out new rules based on limited information which may be indicative of how fast you can learn, but that doesn't take into account how do you apply what you already know to a new problem or the situation where you apply them , etc.
My only weakness it's that i am extremely lazy, in fact i figured out (or at least i think i did) most of the patterns, i had more than 15 min to spare for the couple ones i skipped and didn't even try.
By the way Chess is a game of memory more than a game of intelligence, professional players have huge mental databases of positions and patterns and basic tactical/strategic concepts to use before they reach truly uncharted territory.
My wallet's weight is 126 kg, so I guess I won :D
Quote from: alanrotoi on March 12, 2013, 08:41:53 PM
My wallet's weight is 126 kg, so I guess I won :D
5 centavo = 2 g ---> 63.000 coins, 3.150 argentin peso, ~600 USD... hmmm... you can make a nice trip from that.
Quote from: adpunk on March 12, 2013, 06:20:46 PM
By the way Chess is a game of memory more than a game of intelligence, professional players have huge mental databases of positions and patterns and basic tactical/strategic concepts to use before they reach truly uncharted territory.
Tell me more.. :) Because I am not prone to believe you.
126 as well; unlike adpunk, however, I used all of the available time. In any case, this test appears to require a very specific kind of reasoning. It would be interesting to read the actual evidence for the correlation of results such as these these and general intelligence, whatever that is.
Yeah, I outsmart everyone of you, suckers!!
Quote from: Chulk on March 13, 2013, 05:28:34 AM
Yeah, I outsmart everyone of you, suckers!!
suspicious as always :P
(maybe you are rather argammon)
Quote from: CTG on March 13, 2013, 08:28:24 AM
(maybe you are rather argammon)
No way I'm ammargon... I'm already Rotoi, Gutix, Ayrton, Aburaf and AlanChuytrix, I can't have any more ghost!! Who do you think I am? you?
I think all of us are Short Cutfinder's ghosts.
In a hurry I scored 115. Seems I am the most stupid around here. :D (which is probably true)