News:

Herr Otto Partz says you're all nothing but pipsqueaks!

Main Menu

Politics around the world

Started by CTG, November 17, 2006, 11:30:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Somehow I think Obama won't be a president for a long time. What do you think?

He'll be the president for 8 years.
7 (31.8%)
He'll be the president for 4 years.
7 (31.8%)
He'll fail earlier because of the economical crisis.
1 (4.5%)
He'll be murdered earlier by terrorists/Ku Klux Klan/McCain/Hillary Clinton :D
7 (31.8%)

Total Members Voted: 21

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 37
User actions

JTK

#45
February 04, 2008, 10:58:19 AM
Quote from: Krys TOFF on February 01, 2008, 04:37:49 PM
Sadly, I never heard of "Spitting Image"...
Sorry for the English link, but the French article is far too bad...: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitting_Image
Vintage Stunts Racing at http://www.kalpen.de

BonzaiJoe

#46
February 06, 2008, 01:07:18 AM
You didn't include the republicans :)

Any Huckabee supporters around?
But we can't be quite sure.

BonzaiJoe

#47
February 06, 2008, 12:32:36 PM
Yes, Clinton's lead is a bit too big :-/. What's positive for Obama though is that the missing states by now are all rural states, mainly southern and midwest. Obama has been strong in that kind of states, while Clinton has been stronger in the "blue" states with big cities and lots of people.
But we can't be quite sure.

lised

#48
February 06, 2008, 12:37:04 PM
I'm quite surprised that Hillary won in California  :-\

lised

#49
February 06, 2008, 12:50:32 PM
Quote from: CTG on February 06, 2008, 12:45:05 PM
California is a very stupid state, just think on the elected Schwarzenegger. ;D

Schwarzengger? I thought he was just a character in Simpsons?  ;)

JTK

#50
February 06, 2008, 01:16:16 PM
Quote from: lised on February 06, 2008, 12:50:32 PM
Schwarzengger? I thought he was just a character in Simpsons?  ;)
:D :D :D
You made my day,Lise!
Vintage Stunts Racing at http://www.kalpen.de

Krys TOFF

#51
February 06, 2008, 01:36:08 PM
Quote from: JTK on February 04, 2008, 10:58:19 AM
Quote from: Krys TOFF on February 01, 2008, 04:37:49 PM
Sadly, I never heard of "Spitting Image"...
Sorry for the English link, but the French article is far too bad...: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitting_Image
Don't be sorry, I can speak and read english. :D ;)

lised

#52
February 06, 2008, 04:08:12 PM
Even though it doesn't look too good, I think there's still hope  :D *thinks positive*

BonzaiJoe

#53
February 06, 2008, 04:56:26 PM
Let's look at some statistics:

States won by Clinton:
BLUE (6): New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, California, Michigan, Massachusetts
RED (5): Tennessee, Nevada, Arkansas, Arizona, Oklahoma
GREY (1): Florida

States won by Obama:
BLUE (4): Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Minnesota
RED (11): Utah, North Dakota, Missouri, Kansas, Idaho, Georgia, Colorado, Alaska, Alabama, South Carolina, Iowa

States yet to have their primary elections:
BLUE (8): Washington, Oregon, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Rhode Island, Maine, Hawaii, D.C.
RED (11): Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Texas, Kentucky, Indiana, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, Louisiana
GREY (1): Ohio

Okay those stats aren't very conclusive, but there you have them :)
But we can't be quite sure.

lised

#54
February 06, 2008, 05:43:40 PM
And:
Numbers of delegated (is that the right word?)
H = 845
O = 765

...there's no doubt about who will win on the other side, but I still think it's very exciting on "the right side"

BonzaiJoe

#55
February 06, 2008, 06:35:58 PM
Which happens to be the left side  :)
But we can't be quite sure.

lised

#56
February 06, 2008, 07:32:53 PM
Quote from: BonzaiJoe on February 06, 2008, 06:35:58 PM
Which happens to be the left side  :)

Yes? I know? ...right as in right/wrong!

BonzaiJoe

#57
February 06, 2008, 07:39:38 PM
Quote from: lised on February 06, 2008, 07:32:53 PM
Quote from: BonzaiJoe on February 06, 2008, 06:35:58 PM
Which happens to be the left side  :)

Yes? I know? ...right as in right/wrong!

;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) Oh, I hadn't thought of that at all  ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
But we can't be quite sure.

BonzaiJoe

#58
February 06, 2008, 07:45:02 PM
Quote from: CTG on January 21, 2007, 09:10:40 PM
Yes, I would feel better in 19th century. Women's task: cook, wash, skid.

Your task: work three times as hard in order to support the woman and your 21 kids (protection not invented)


(hmm, sorry about the 1 year answer delay...)
But we can't be quite sure.

BonzaiJoe

#59
February 06, 2008, 08:18:29 PM
Okay if you don't care that your children die, you still have to take care of the woman. Reason: she's not as good to skid if she's malnutritioned.
But we can't be quite sure.

Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 37
User actions