https://tiermaker.com/user/18789815
You can make your own tier list of Stunts pipsqueaks in Zakstunts. There are some historical pipsqueaks but mostly from the last 4 years who raced more than few times.
Use your own parameters to sort them: current performance, at their prime, potential, overrated, history, determination, teamwork, results, stability, all mixed. After completing please share a screenshot or save a picture and share it here! If you want to add some comments, please be my guest.
Possibly wrong link? 🤔
THE FORUM CHANGES THE WORD "R A C E R" TO "pipsqueak" in the link...
This link works: https://tiermaker.com/user/18789815
Thanks
@alanrotoi, changing pipsqueaks to R A C E R S seems to work!
Or as I wrote:
https://forum.stunts.hu/index.php?topic=4494.msg98464#msg98464
Quotehttps://cobbpg.github.io/articles/stunt-car-r@cer-plus4-port.html
As I mentioned this forum has some bugs (unlike Stunts), so copy link address and replace "@" with "a".
https://forum.stunts.hu/index.php?topic=4494.msg98539#msg98539
QuoteAnyone interested in Stunt Car R@cer? The car has suspension, it bounces after landing and has "boost" for accelerating before jumps.
Sorry for leaving out the relatively new names. Rankings are (mostly) based on good old times. Probably my memory is fading, too.
It's ok, sometimes we just forget the performance pipsqueaks in 25 years of history. My analysis for some pipsqueaks are only because the result records and not because I saw them race (i.e. FinRok, Seeker1982). Others are just in the limit of the tier I placed (Zapper, Friker).
This is my tier list. Few places could change after a deeper analysis.
Quote from: alanrotoi on November 05, 2025, 03:30:32 AMIt's ok, sometimes we just forget the performance pipsqueaks in 25 years of history. My analysis for some pipsqueaks are only because the result records and not because I saw them race (i.e. FinRok, Seeker1982). Others are just in the limit of the tier I placed (Zapper, Friker).
This is my tier list. Few places could change after a deeper analysis.
Naaaaaah...
Akoss Poo in Tier B? No way. Maybe I have more victories, but I'm pretty sure he's better than me, especially in noRH category. My racing strategy is more opportunistic, I adapt to the public time results and beat reference points - without those hints, I am simply slow. Poo can produce quality RPLs even without knowing the result of X or Y.
This is so cool!
It would be great to have one of the veterans create a video using this tier maker while explaining the reasoning behind their placement.
I would do it with
@Cas and
@Chulk to cover a couple of eras and to help with English ;D .
I hope that my ranking does not offend anybody, it just reflects my personal opinion. It is also worth pointing out that I did not rank the pipsqueaks within each tier. I focused on Zakstunts RH results. If I had taken NORH into account, Bonzai Joe and Seeker1982 would be in the top tier and Renato would drop a tier.
My ranking is mostly based on Duplode's Historical Folyami ranking (https://scr.stunts.hu/folyami.html) with a few adaptions: image_2025-11-06_164303922.png
Notably:
- MiDiaN: According to Folyami, he should be in tier 2. However, I do not feel that a single win is enough to justify that position. If he wins next year's championship, he moves up one tier on my ranking. (PS: I find it a bit strange that MiDiaN is on the same tier as I on Alanrotoi's ranking when our current direct-clash score is 9-1.)
- Alain and Bonzai Joe: Should be on tier 3 according to Folyami. I moved them up one tier because they are champions and because the Folyami ratings are likely not precise for the early years.
Quick edit: I just noticed that I dropped Bismarck into tier D by accident. He does not have enough Zakstunts races to be ranked properly. The same is true for Fdziera.
Quote from: alanrotoi on November 05, 2025, 03:30:32 AMIt's ok, sometimes we just forget the performance pipsqueaks in 25 years of history. My analysis for some pipsqueaks are only because the result records and not because I saw them race (i.e. FinRok, Seeker1982). Others are just in the limit of the tier I placed (Zapper, Friker).
This is my tier list. Few places could change after a deeper analysis.
I should also explain a bit my impressions. Maybe I'll make alive stream about it if I have the time butblet's write some thoughts.
Every tier has different levels inside, so a tier is mor like a wide row of similarities but not always means same performances.
- the "S" big 4: they are Ayrton and then the rest. Maybe Renato Biker is a bit over Gutix and Duplode but it's hard to analyze only watching their replays, you had to live the moment and I think I wasn't contemporary to Renato's prime for example so I can't be 100% sure about it. What I don't have doubt is that they are over the rest of us.
- Tier A: it mixes some different eras. From a personal point of view I feel my prime was in 2002-2005 (zct16-zct47) period but I haven't seasonal results at zakstunts mainly because I haven't been constant in yearly racing periods. I could maintain a high level in short periods of time, few months then I got burned. Also the opponents and the many other competitions and stunts projectsbwere time demanding. I feel my performance of that era was higher than my 2021-2022 when I won two championships in a row. I had a stronger opponent (Duplode) but I think he didn't fight at full strenght often. Back in 2002 and 2003 I found my "nemesis" in Bonzai Joe who I think he was also at his prime and we had several months in intense fights on tracks.
Also Alain had a great performance back then, in fact he was quiet low in the scoreboards at his beginning but suddenly he was at top almost in every race. Argammon was another pipsqueak with small top shockwaves. You could find a great performance in theor laps but without a season success. All of these pre 2008. Also CTG was a different pipsqueak. Automatic transm. pipsqueak and in the mid of the scoreboard, he found from 2007 that he can reach a top level.
Quote from: alanrotoi on November 06, 2025, 05:41:05 PMI should also explain a bit my impressions. Maybe I'll make alive stream about it if I have the time butblet's write some thoughts. (...)
Every tier has different levels inside, so a tier is mor like a wide row of similarities but not always means same performances.
- the "S" big 4: they are Ayrton and then the rest. Maybe Renato Biker is a bit over Gutix and Duplode but it's hard to analyze only watching their replays, you had to live the moment and I think I wasn't contemporary to Renato's prime for example so I can't be 100% sure about it. What I don't have doubt is that they are over the rest of us. (...)
And here I disagree, but I respect your opinion. I do not feel comfortable blowing my own trumpet, but let me explain why I disagree:
In the old days, I am clearly not on the top tier. (So I agree with CTG's ranking in that sense). However, also considering 2023-2025 I think that I am. I do not base my assessment "only" on the Folyami rankings which are at least somewhat objective, but also on replays.
Before 2023, most of my replays were rather mundane. I did not produce any lap on the level of the following examples (not exhaustive):
https://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT260 (An impossible trick)
https://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT264
https://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT280 (First flight of that type in competition)
https://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT284 (Flight is repeated showing it is not a fluke but a tool)
https://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT289
Yes, all of these examples are power-gear laps. But power gear is an important part of Zakstunts. 8)
Quote from: Argammon on November 06, 2025, 04:57:26 PMMy ranking is mostly based on Duplode's Historical Folyami ranking (https://scr.stunts.hu/folyami.html)
Still, you've placed me in mid-B rank after KyLiE? My win rate against KyLiE is 9-1, while against Duplode it's 5-5 so far this season. It's gotta be something other than performance, right? There's no way this makes sense.
EDIT: Sorry I missed that you didn't rank within each tier. Still, able to defeat S-rank players after a over 20-year break and only B rank feels strange.
I was afraid that a thread like this would not end well.
@MiDiaN: Regarding your comment "Still, you've placed me in mid-B rank after KyLiE?", I did write that I did not rank the pipsqueaks within each tier.* Indeed, I started alphabetically with the first few before abandoning the idea because it took too much time.
Other than that, you are raising some valid points, but the issue is subtle. I mentioned our 9-1 score because it covers your entire Zakstunts career. Hence, our direct comparison is a very valid benchmark.
The question is how far we can stretch that kind of argument if one of the pipsqueaks is either "past prime" or not racing hard. One could argue that such a pipsqueak was much better in the past. Duplode is a good example in this context.
The problem with this line of argumentation is that it can be used as a killer argument because it can always be claimed that you only won because the competitors did not try hard. There is no way to refute that point. Hence, our "rankings" are
highly subjective.
Your 9-1 score against Kylie is a valid argument of course. But does that mean that with a single race win you should be in the same tier as pipsqueaks who won one or more championships? Perhaps, or perhaps not. It seems that there are not enough tires to catch all the subtleties.
*If you must know, I think that you are the strongest pipsqueak in tier 3. :) I would rank the tier 1 pipsqueaks as follows (please don't shoot me!): Ayrton, Argammon, Duplode, Gutix, Renato.
What is good of this tier tool is to make it easy the personal point of view, the feeling or impressions about ourselves and the rest. That's not good or bad, it's the truth from every of us.
I agree with Argammon when he says he's in a better shape than in 2001 or 2003. I think, however, he overrates his performance, his without doubt excellent performance. Nobody can say some tricks he showed aren't excellent. I don't see his current (2023-now) performance in the next level. What is the next level for me? When you watch replays and you say more than once "how he thought it could be possible? And then he did it". There are two steps here, watching the map or while doing a replay you can imagine tricks/shortcuts and the other step is performing them. The first is pure knowledge of the game and the later may be influenced by time, by will power, determination, skills and more.
Anyway, sometimes is harder to rate ourselves than others. Sometimes we overrate or underrate ourselves, this is natural and it's ok.
Quote from: Argammon on November 06, 2025, 06:00:24 PMhttps://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT280 (First flight of that type in competition)
I remember Gutix doing this trick, somebody would remind me which track it was.
Duplode is a giant that likes to sleep a lot ;D He's the best active pipsqueak.
About Akoss' performance I put him in B tier, probably because I didn't race against him at his prime when I wasn't sending elaborated replays. I feel CTG from 2021 was harder to race than Akoss 2003 (not his prime). That's why the different tiers in my evaluation.
MiDiaN is a surprise for me. He came from paleolitic Stunts eras like Mark Nailwood (who I worship as the best of the pre-ZakStunts era). He (MiDiaN) is showing an unimaginable performance and he's growing and growing. I see in him potential to stay in tier A but I also know he didn't show everything he can do yet. So I'll keep watching him because the big 4 could find the 5th mate. If I can play Palpatine once again (I did it with Gutix and Ayrton) it would be fantastic. I hope the language won't be a barrier.
And as I like top tiers, I find a lot of fun in the fights that doesn't appear in the newspapers. I mean to be in a B or C tiers doesn't mean the fights, the races or the tricks are less interesting. Back in 2021 I followed close the season fight between Overdrijf, dreadnaut, Zapper and Heretic. These "silent" fights must be awarded somehow. That's why we started to elaborated ideas like PTB, a wider point system that covers more pipsqueaks than the top 4. I think it needs few fixes but i's already a success.
Quote from: alanrotoi on November 06, 2025, 08:48:01 PM(...)
What is good of this tier tool is to make it easy the personal point of view, the feeling or impressions about ourselves and the rest. That's not good or bad, it's the truth from every of us.
I agree with Argammon when he says he's in a better shape than in 2001 or 2003. I think, however, he overrates his performance, his without doubt excellent performance. Nobody can say some tricks he showed aren't excellent. I don't see his current (2023-now) performance in the next level. What is the next level for me? When you watch replays and you say more than once "how he thought it could be possible? And then he did it". There are two steps here, watching the map or while doing a replay you can imagine tricks/shortcuts and the other step is performing them. The first is pure knowledge of the game and the later may be influenced by time, by will power, determination, skills and more.
Anyway, sometimes is harder to rate ourselves than others. Sometimes we overrate or underrate ourselves, this is natural and it's ok.
(...)
I wrote that I do not like blowing my own horn and that is true. Hence, I am not going to continue doing it. All I will say is that your "measurements" are highly subjective. Because you, Alanrotoi, rate the replays of your personal top four more highly than mine you conclude that they are a tier above me.
There is no possible way for me to "refute" such a subjective view. Hence, let us just agree to disagree.
Edit: To clarify, I don't have a problem that we disagree on these subjective "tiers". It is fine with me that you do not see me in your personal top 4. I am just pointing out that our rankings are of a very subjective nature and that I do not agree with yours.
About tier E I deliverated added Skid here. From a personal POV at least Skid's performance (a bit above him and a bit under him) is still an amateur level. When I joined the community I was at that level. I beated Skid 90% of times at home competitions (My brother, AI opponents and me). Try this exercise: a track without water, without bridges, without PG, without pipes or corkscrews and without shortcuts (try to stay on the road mainly). Only asphalt, banked roads, highways, loops. Race against Skid both with the same car, then tell me if he's that easy.
Quote from: Argammon on November 06, 2025, 09:34:25 PMAll I will say is that your "measurements" are highly subjective.
Of course, that's the meaning. This doesn't make it any less important. To show and to know our personal subjectivety in a tier format. It's important to know how we think and how we see each other. There won't be a wrong tier list and also there can be more than one tier list from every of us since we can have many subjectiveties or points of view according to the many virtues a pipsqueak's performance can be catalogued.
Every opinion,always is made from facts and from subjectivety. We should fear an IA if it developes subjectivety... or not. But how it works my opinion here? I know I can beat you at any time as I also know you can beat me at any time. I can't say the same with Duplode. This video is the best way to explain my point:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ8JXL2gFTo
Quote from: alanrotoi on November 06, 2025, 09:49:10 PMQuote from: Argammon on November 06, 2025, 09:34:25 PMAll I will say is that your "measurements" are highly subjective.
Of course, that's the meaning. This doesn't make it any less important. To show and to know our personal subjectivety in a tier format. It's important to know how we think and how we see each other. There won't be a wrong tier list and also there can be more than one tier list from every of us since we can have many subjectiveties or points of view according to the many virtues a pipsqueak's performance can be catalogued.
Every opinion,always is made from facts and from subjectivety. We should fear an IA if it developes subjectivety... or not. But how it works my opinion here? I know I can beat you at any time as I also know you can beat me at any time. I can't say the same with Duplode. This video is the best way to explain my point:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ8JXL2gFTo
He is faster than you "on the road" and you are doing more tricks. Since there are not many tricks on this track he wins. It's actually pretty simple. Can we stop this silly discussion?
I'm still pretty new to this community, so I won't make a full tier list, but after watching a bunch of replays from top players, I wanted to share some notable ones. This is just my personal list, sorry if I missed anyone.
Alien-tier 👽 - You start wondering if these players are human or some kind of secret AI experiment gone rogue.
Renato Biker, Ayrton, Alan Rotoi
S-tier 💎 - Flawless lines, no mistakes. Almost pixel-perfect driving.
Gutix, Duplode, CTG, Akoss Poo, FinRok, Alain
Quote from: Argammon on November 06, 2025, 11:08:53 PMHe is faster than you "on the road" and you are doing more tricks. Since there are not many tricks on this track he wins. It's actually pretty simple.
Yes, this was the zct243 but not always was like this. The point of the video is to show no matter the effort I did or the crazy tricks I tryied, he beated me with a simplier but perfect drive that was the best choice.
Quote from: Argammon on November 06, 2025, 11:08:53 PMCan we stop this silly discussion?
It was never a discussion from me. So no hard feelings from my part. This is an exchange of point of view and opinions. There is no tier list of opinions ;D . CTG said a valid point in my list about akoss' performance. I see good will in the comments of this thread so we can keep doing and sharing lists!
Quote from: alanrotoi on November 07, 2025, 12:32:14 AMQuote from: Argammon on November 06, 2025, 11:08:53 PMHe is faster than you "on the road" and you are doing more tricks. Since there are not many tricks on this track he wins. It's actually pretty simple.
Yes, this was the zct243 but not always was like this. The point of the video is to show no matter the effort I did or the crazy tricks I tryied, he beated me with a simplier but perfect drive that was the best choice.
Quote from: Argammon on November 06, 2025, 11:08:53 PMCan we stop this silly discussion?
It was never a discussion from me. So no hard feelings from my part. This is an exchange of point of view and opinions. There is no tier list of opinions ;D . CTG said a valid point in my list about akoss' performance. I see good will in the comments of this thread so we can keep doing and sharing lists!
Sorry for not being clear. What I tried suggesting was that we stop our discussion about whether I belong in tier A or S. Whereas I put more weight on (somewhat) object measures such as the Folyami rating (Me->Tier S), direct clashes (Ayrton, Gutix -> tier S), the medal table (Duplode ->Tier S, MidiAN ->one tier down), or a combination of those (Renato->Tier S), you look at replays and subjectively decide which ones you like best. We are not going to reach an agreement here, but -as mentioned- it is fine to agree to disagree. You are of course free to continue discussing the tiers with other pipsqueaks as long as you please. :)
Regarding the replay you posted, there is little doubt that Duplode is one of the best OWOOT pipsqueaks in history. But even the top pipsqueaks have different strengths and weaknesses. It is not like Duplode is better than you on every possible type of track.
Finally, I would like to point out that even the "track" issue is subtle. As an example, consider someone saying "pipsqueak X is best at power-gear". What does this really mean? Even here, we have to distinguish between
- Tracks where doing a power-gear lap is easy and the race is about finding the last milliseconds. https://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT287 is a good example for this.
- Tracks where doing a power-gear lap is extremely difficult. Here the most important issue is to complete a power-gear lap where others fail, see https://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT284 for example
- Tracks where doing a power-gear lap is easy but that hide incredible but difficult shortcuts that upon completion give a pipsqueak the upper edge, https://zak.stunts.hu/tracks/ZCT260 is a prime example for this. (How you cannot admire this trick is beyond me. If Ayrton did it, it would be the most magical trick in stunts history.)
Of course, you could add more categories and thereby make the list even more fine grained. My point is that it is not the same pipsqueak who is the best in all possible categories. The same is true for the many different types of NON-PG tracks.
This will be my last post on this topic for a while as I will be away travelling. So see you at the end of ZCT292.
What I can promise is that I am not going to submit a maxed out replay, meaning that I will only be able to win if I find tricks or shortcuts that the competitors do not. But tricks and shortcuts are what I love about Zakstunts. Spending half an hour to max out a corner is what I find extremely boring.
Bonus:
Tier B: Dottore
Tier C: Bolo Yeung, Navras, Böllér Jani, Rokker Zsolti
Tier D: CrazyDriver, Ukyo Katayama, Zweigelt
;D ;D ;D
(Yes, there were many other, less important ghosts - I don't remember them.)
I'll have
@alanrotoi and
@Argammon in my S tier of folks who create interesting threads.
I don't know enough to attempt a tier, but I'll put
@CTG and
@Renato Biker at the top tier for "pipsqueaks who are good at hinting and explaining how to drive well". Marco, Seeker1982, Duplode and FinRok are brilliant at the
driving bit, so deadly in live races. Tricks are an interesting mix of patience, attention to detail, imagination, and dedication/time. I have trouble differentiating, but I know I can get the first two with a powergear car. I have only admiration for those who can put consistent skill and effort on all those fronts.
Interesting topic! Here's my tier list:
S Class – Has won a ZakStunts championship
A Class – Has won at least one ZakStunts race
B Class – Has finished on the podium in at least one ZakStunts race
C Class – Has won at least one ZakStunts race in the Amateur League
D Class – Has finished on the podium in at least one ZakStunts Amateur League race
E Class – Has participated in the championship
Note 1 — Mark Nailwood didn't win a championship at ZakStunts, but if you race him in an automatic transmission, you'll be obliterated faster than your lap timer even starts
Note 2 - Victor Narl didn't run enough to reach the podium, but I know he's capable
Note 3 - The names are not listed in order of preference; I simply added them to the list
Note 4 - Perhaps I made a mistake with some pipsqueak, many of the names are unfamiliar, it's nothing personal
Tier list updated... thanks
@alanrotoi
Quote from: Erik Barros on November 09, 2025, 03:57:05 AMNote 4 - Perhaps I made a mistake with some pipsqueak, many of the names are unfamiliar, it's nothing personal
Nice way to sort the pipsqueaks! Only one adjustment, Alain won 2003's championship.
What I really missed from becoming a top tier pipsqueak: consistency (and reliable nerves).
I have several weak cars and my performance is heavily depending on reference points.
2002-2003: Tier C
2004-2006: Tier B (a few ZCT victories, mixed with really awful performance in several races)
2007-: Tier A (but far from S), sometimes falling back to B
My best year was 2014 (yeah, the DQF one, main opponents: Duplode, Akoss Poo), probably the closest to Tier S:
P1, P3, P3, P4, P1, P1, P1, P2, P2, P2, P1, DNS
Quote from: Erik Barros on November 09, 2025, 03:57:05 AMNote 4 - Perhaps I made a mistake with some pipsqueak, many of the names are unfamiliar, it's nothing personal
Very nice fact-based list - I belong in Class B, though, because I've never won a ZakStunts race.
See my 100% objective and realistic ratings.
S: Untouchable, master of Stunts.
A: Top tier pipsqueaks. If they make a 100% effort, I can never beat them.
B: I have always felt to be inferior related to S and A drivers. On my day, with full effort, maybe I can beat them on my day, on may track (Indy/IMSA), otherwise, S and A are cleary better drivers than me. On the other hand, I feel superior related to divison C. I can mention no driver like this.
C: If I make 100% effort, I can beat them. Though, they are good Stunts pipsqueaks. Earlier drivers like Ben and Roy: I think they knew advanced replay handling before us - they sent times are easy to beat now.
D: Skilled Stunts pipsqueaks, though, they haven't proved ever to me to put them higher (or I haven't seen it).
E: Others.
Remark: S-A-C cathegory may contain drivers with multiple accounts, but this time, I have rated without presuming ghost presence.