Herr Otto Partz says you're all nothing but pipsqueaks!
Started by zaqrack, December 14, 2008, 02:47:20 PM
Quote from: Duplode on September 01, 2009, 04:12:15 PM(PS.: a long while ago I thought about a different sort of renormalization, to be done every six months or so, that would keep the average of all bonuses unchanged, in order to not break the system, but would modify all bonuses so that the standard deviation is reduced, thus fitting the values into a desired range. I don't have the calculations with me right now, but after you do them the final formulas are a lot simpler than it sounds. But just changing the ranges is far less messy of a solution.)
Quote15,23659562 15,38730746 18,58452624 20,54263858 20,34698995 21,71139368 20,76239204 21,59772068 21,28560366
Quote from: zaqrack on September 01, 2009, 06:14:41 PMQuite strangely, the standard deviation isn't rising so much as the summa of the bonuses do:
Quote from: Mingva on September 01, 2009, 10:50:24 PMI don't get it, but are the negative car bonuses equal to positive bonuses for not used cars? Is it means, if this/last month plus is 60, then LM002 and Jaguar get -60? If yes, then system isn't so smart.I'd think it would be better to have constant negative bonus for podium cars. Let's say, 1st place gets -10%, 2nd -7%, 3rd -5%. Another solution - negative bonuses proportional to car selection value (taking in consideration top12; more people uses the same car - the bigger loss). Or even a mix of those two ideas.