Howdy
Let me drop my 2 cents here...
It is not a coincidence ZakStunts had most of the time a linear scoreboard.
IMHO there are two key - and contradicting - factors, which always drove the point system:
1) Value regular participation as much as possible (which if I remember well is also the reason why LTB was born in the first place ... then came quiet days to make it even more important)
2) Do not discourage regularly participating pipsqueaks if they skip a few races (hence ignoring the worst races)
Most of the time we struggled with a low amount of regular pipsqueaks and hence the point system was always somewhat biased for participation. The one exception was 2003 when we had plenty of pipsqueaks, so we switched to nascar-style, as it was not really a problem for most to be present throughout the season.
I still feel that race winners are awarded in other ways well enough (hall of fame, etc.) and we you can never encourage enough the "middle class", who are enthusiastic and very often the backbone and driving force of the community, even though they cannot even dream of finishing on the top.
That said, I have not been really around recently. If you feel the situation has changed, do not hesitate to change the points system. Just wanted to share the key ideas that drove my thoughts back in the early ZS years and hint that -at least for me- the key driver for the system was always the incentive to keep the community active and engaged.
The points for the 12+ positions were a technical compromise. Any change to this part can just improve things.
Let me drop my 2 cents here...
It is not a coincidence ZakStunts had most of the time a linear scoreboard.
IMHO there are two key - and contradicting - factors, which always drove the point system:
1) Value regular participation as much as possible (which if I remember well is also the reason why LTB was born in the first place ... then came quiet days to make it even more important)
2) Do not discourage regularly participating pipsqueaks if they skip a few races (hence ignoring the worst races)
Most of the time we struggled with a low amount of regular pipsqueaks and hence the point system was always somewhat biased for participation. The one exception was 2003 when we had plenty of pipsqueaks, so we switched to nascar-style, as it was not really a problem for most to be present throughout the season.
I still feel that race winners are awarded in other ways well enough (hall of fame, etc.) and we you can never encourage enough the "middle class", who are enthusiastic and very often the backbone and driving force of the community, even though they cannot even dream of finishing on the top.
That said, I have not been really around recently. If you feel the situation has changed, do not hesitate to change the points system. Just wanted to share the key ideas that drove my thoughts back in the early ZS years and hint that -at least for me- the key driver for the system was always the incentive to keep the community active and engaged.
The points for the 12+ positions were a technical compromise. Any change to this part can just improve things.