Herr Otto Partz says you're all nothing but pipsqueaks!
Started by Mark L. Rivers, December 18, 2006, 09:43:56 PM
Quote from: zaqracknice! sounds like a more balanced system to me!
Quote from: Krys TOFF on December 19, 2006, 09:50:31 AMQuote from: zaqracknice! sounds like a more balanced system to me!True, but that means I'll be out of top 10...
Quote from: Mark L. Riverssee the graphic below:
Quote from: Mark L. Riversthe Coefficient?s curve decreases logarithmically his gradient, and this means that a very high Participation?s Rate doesn?t affect on Total Points too much respect a medium Participation?s Rate, as it happened with previous criteria.Why Log12? And why add it 1,5? There?s no a complex and specific mathematic calculation behind new coefficient. Factors which have contribute to calculate it, have been choosen looking for a curve that could obtains the desired target, that is, as aforesaid, to avoid that a low or an high rate of participation affect abnormally the rank. After many trials I think to have individuate a curve which reaches this target with a right balance.
Quote from: Mark L. RiversCurrent rank will be soon re-calculated with new criteria.
Quote from: Mark L. RiversAn example to see how this concept works:SWR FINAL RESULTS OF A NEW RACEDriver Driver Score Additional Points TOT01) A 01) D 20 +3 (ahead C-A-B) 0 23 02) B 02) C 15 +2 (ahead A-B) -1 (behind D) 16 03) C 03) A 12 0 -2 (behind D-C) 10 04) D 04) B 8 0 -2 (behind D-C) 6 05) E 05) L 8 +5 (ahead G-H-F-I-E) 0 13 06) F 06) G 8 +2 (ahead F-E) -1 (behind L) 9 07) G 07) H 4 +2 (ahead F-E) -1 (behind L) 5 08) H 08) F 4 +1 (ahead E) -3 (behind L-G-H) 2 09) I 09) I 4 +1 (ahead E) -1 (behind L) 4 10) L 10) E 4 0 -5 (behind L-G-H-F-I) -1
Quote from: zaqracknice job!probably the most complicated Stunts ranking ever, but it sounds good!
Quote from: Krys TOFF on December 30, 2006, 09:30:59 PMWith new system, I drop from 5th to 8th place. Good, I feared to be out of top ten.