no replay handling

[Ruepel]

I'm sorry to say that I agree with Bonzai Joe.  



12XU

[Argammon]

I don't like replay handling either and think FredMercs idea is the  best and most likely so far.



Making the menuitem dissapear isn't the problem but how do you want to make sure someone used the 'enhanced version' ?



As for trust:

I would like to trust everyone but those ppl who say replay handling only improves your time ' a little' are doubtfull.

IMO you lose about 10 seconds on a hard 1.30 min track which is pretty much.(December contest last year is a good example)

Even on the 'chicken way' I DO lose about 4 seconds if I don't use replay handling.



Edited by: Argammon at: 3/16/02 10:24:19 pm

[al il professore]

i think noone thought about the webcamed no replay handling competition? someone is the referee and watches someone playing thru ewrama or another webcam software. no replay handling no more

perhaps more than ten of us got a webcam? if not, its not possible.

[Mingva]

I could buy webcam, it's not expensive But I don't know how it will work with my current 64/128kbps internet connection :?

[al il professore]

well, my current internet connection is also 64/128 and it runs. but the connexion speed is not a 'real' problem with webcam.

[Mingva]

but the connexion speed is not a 'real' problem with webcam.

And what's the real problem? And maybe you could recommend which webcam to buy?

[al il professore]

there are lots of webcams that you can use as a pocket photo camera. those are the good choice. the connection speed can be a problem for surgery in strasbourg for a physician sitting in new york who needs high speed connexion. we are not over payed physicians with silly ideas...

[Akoss Poo a.k.a. Zorromeister]

An intelligent message:

pArAnO is a potato.

[DieselJoe]

Why here? :roll:

[Akoss Poo a.k.a. Zorromeister]

Because he only raced IRC, and he was one of the best drivers without replay handling.