News:

Herr Otto Partz says you're all nothing but pipsqueaks!

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Renato Biker

#31
Month`s Tracks - USC / Aggtelek
May 03, 2006, 04:32:54 AM
:D  :D  :D  :D  :D  :D

thank you
#32
Chat - Misc / addictive music
May 02, 2006, 06:37:50 AM
hahaha :lol: hahaha  really addictive  :D  you just make me happier  :wink:

does she speaking something?
#33
Month`s Tracks - USC / Aggtelek
April 29, 2006, 10:52:29 PM
:smt078  :smt023  :smt039  :smt063  :finga:  :smt118  :smt040
#34
Chat - Misc / Illness
April 29, 2006, 07:49:11 AM
what is Illness?
#35
Team Zone / Silver Spirit
April 29, 2006, 07:46:56 AM
yes, Silver Spirit is a good team, like you said  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D
#36
Chat - Misc / Sports & freetime
April 28, 2006, 06:35:03 AM
let a real mathematic answer it :):

Quote from: "Krys TOFF"
/Mathematics lesson ON

If you mean a result as 22.xxx, then you need to write 73/(1.79*1.79).
Without "(" and ")", operations must be done in the order they are written, therefore 73/1.79*1.79 means "written on paper" (as argammon says) :
     73
  -------- * 1.79 = 73
    1.79
accurately

Quote from: "Krys TOFF"Mathematically, * and / must be done before + and -.
But there is no order between + and -, and no order between / and *.
This is a mathematic rule, not an interpretation. :wink:
this isn't a rule, it's a definition! so different...


Quote from: "Krys TOFF"Let me give example : 2+3*5=17, and not 25.
* has priority compared to +, so first you must calculate 3*5=15, and then calculate 15+2=17.
thus defined

Quote from: "Krys TOFF"But 73*1.79/1.79=73/1.79*1.79=73. No priority order, operations must be done in the order they are written.
multiplication's associative property

Quote from: "Krys TOFF"Same thing for 2+3-1=2-1+3=4. No priority order.
addition associative property

Quote from: "Krys TOFF"You need to write 73/(1.79*1.79) to have 22.xxxx has a result.

Anyway, as Argammon says, some bad calculators do not recognize the operation priorities, so 2+3*5 would give 25 as a result.
This is wrong. To have 25 as a result, you have to write (2+3)*5.

Ask your mathematics teacher if you want confirmation. :-D

/Mathematics lesson OFF

that's right, but Argammon didn't said it  :-D
just have care with your words, "operation priorities" is wrong, it's a defined operation orders, not a prioeities  :wink:
#37
General Chat - USC / UnskilledStunts 2006/07
April 28, 2006, 06:01:26 AM
ok, maybe I can calculate it  :P
#38
General Chat - USC / UnskilledStunts 2006/07
April 26, 2006, 05:48:26 AM
2006-04-15 00:49   Renato Biker   0:47.75   M   RUNS   RUNS

CTG, where can I see how much leading hours I have now?
#39
Chat - Misc / Sports & freetime
April 25, 2006, 05:37:49 AM
to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat, to sleep and eat,... :P
#40
Month`s Tracks - USC / Aggtelek
April 25, 2006, 05:31:57 AM
Quote from: "Chulk"I have a new PC so I haven't been able to play stunts in it yet. But I'll wake up and regain my lost position. :twisted:

yes, your second place :!: but not the first  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D
#41
Month`s Tracks - USC / Aggtelek
April 24, 2006, 07:05:56 PM
Quote from: "Chulk"I think CTG is right. High 46 is doable but I don't think many if noone will do it in this race.

that's very right  :D
#42
Prediction Games / ZCT 62 Predictions
April 24, 2006, 07:02:58 PM
let's create a new topic: "the name of Vamolo.."  :P
#43
Competition 2006 / ZCT 62 - Act of grace
April 24, 2006, 06:56:50 PM
Quote from: "Chulk"I said I was not meaning you. I know you where blame for that as Alain did when he was the champion, so don't worry.
By the way, I find some of your jokes funny so keep on that!

ok  :D  ;-)
#44
Motor sports, Racing / Formula One in 2006
April 22, 2006, 02:27:16 AM
look how a formula 1 engine works  :wink:  VERY GREAT :!:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAo6QTrCq4o&search=formula%201
#45
Month`s Tracks - USC / Aggtelek
April 22, 2006, 01:37:45 AM
I talked about 46:xx, it's improbable (if it's possible). I think 46:xx is possible only with some bug bumps... it's just my opinion, not a provocation