Messages

Thanks @dreadnaut!  I'm subscribed now.

I can't believe I missed this one!  I've been checking the forum once a week for live races, but this one was announced and took place within four days.

[(1:29.90)]

Duplode

1. 1:44.25 (1:44.25)
2. 3:15.60 (1:31.35)
3. 4:45.50 (1:29.90)
4. 6:16.55 (1:31.05)
5. 7:48.25 (1:31.70)
5+ 8:00.00 (On the loop)

My replay attached.

Attached is the modified track for the Chevrolet Camaro!

[(1:04.55)]

Duplode

1. 1:13.15 (1:13.15)
2. 2:20.45 (1:07.30)
3. 3:25.65 (1:05.20)
4. 4:30.60 (1:04.95)
5. 5:36.90 (1:06.30)
6. 6:41.95 (1:05.05)
7. 7:46.50 (1:04.55)
7+ 8:00.00 (In the half pipe)

My replay attached.

I'll do my best to make it.  5:00 AM is going to be grim!  Attached are the paint jobs I'd like to use.

Ha ha!  Thanks @Erik Barros!  Also, thank you @alanrotoi for the race summary.  It was a great race!

[(0:52.60)]

Erik Barros

1. 0:59.05 (0:59.05)
2. 1:51.65 (0:52.60)
3. 2:44.75 (0:53.10)
4. 3:38.05 (0:53.30)
5. 4:31.10 (0:53.05)
6. 5:26.05 (0:54.95)
7. 6:18.90 (0:52.85)
8. 7:13.05 (0:54.15)
8+ 8:00.00 (On the final banked road)

Jumps: 101

My replay attached.

Count me in!  I'll use version 1.0 in red.

I like the idea of limiting the LTB system to the amateur league for the reasons that @Argammon mentioned.  My understanding is that leading time would be awarded for first place on the amateur league scoreboard, otherwise it's not likely that anyone would accrue many leading hours.  @dreadnaut's scoring system sounds good, but I think it may be a little too generous.

Nice work!  Another amazing car makes its way into the Stunts world.  Thank you!

@Duplode, thank you for the detailed analysis!  It's very interesting indeed!